Call For Reviewer
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise Systems (IJIES) is a peer-reviewed international journal which publishes original articles of significant value in all areas of innovation in Enterprise Systems. The journal covers research articles, research-in-brief, and review articles comprising all discipline related to Enterprise Systems, particularly Information Systems & Technology, and the relevant multidisciplinary domain such as Industrial Engineering and Management. The journal welcomes relevant publishable articles including technical innovation, practical IS adoption, management innovation, etc, which is considered as high valued work in this area.
Criteria For Reviewer
1. The reviewer has an expertise in this area (minimal one area) :
- Information and Computational Engineering
Area: Data Mining, AI, Pattern Recognition, Big Data, HCI, Engineering Education and training, Database, Information System, Engineering Economy and Cost Analysis, Engineering Education and Training, Information Retrieval, E-business, e-learning, e-government, information systems, IT governance, etc.
- Design and System
Area: SCM, Organizational Learning, Systems Modeling and Simulation, Design of systems, tools, and equipment, Reliability and Maintenance Engineering, System dynamics, Modeling, and Simulation, Decision Support System and Business Intelligence, etc.
- Enterprise Design and Management System
Area: Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise System, Enterprise Application, Enterprise Knowledge Management, Enterprise Resource Planning, Enterprise management, etc.
- Industrial Safety and Security System
Area: Safety, Security and Risk Management, Healthcare Systems and Management, Service Innovation and Management, Security of IS Enterprise, Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning, Operations Research, Production Planning and Control, Technology Management, Techno-Economic, Feasibility Analysis, etc.
- Economy and e-Business
Area: Economic of IS, Workflow and transaction in e-Business, Business process analysis and design, etc.
2. Has a good publication record (Preferable with H-Index SCOPUS / Google Scholar: minimal 2).
3. Minimum requirement for education : Master Degree (S2)
Responsibility for Reviewers
- Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
- Confidentiality Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Please send your CV and list of publication paper to email@example.com