The Role of E-Learning Readiness on Workload: Perspective Engineering and non-Engineering Students

Litasari W. Suwarsono; Atya N. Aisha; Fida N. Nugraha

doi:10.25124/ijies.v6i01.165

Litasari W. Suwarsono Telkom University
Atya N. Aisha Telkom University
Fida N. Nugraha Telkom University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v6i01.165

Keywords: Online learning, E-learning readiness, Workload, Engineering and non-engineering, Self-Directed Learning

Abstract

Changes in learning methods from face-to-face to online learning due to pandemic covid-19 have an impact on student readiness in learning and the mental workload felt by students, that can determine the achievement of the learning process. There are differences in the characteristics of learning demands in engineering and non-engineering majors. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the level of readiness and mental workload of students during the implementing full online learning based on the characteristics of the education department. Data collected by distributing online questionnaires to 180 students (90 students majoring in engineering and 90 students in non-engineering). Self-directed learning (SDL), technical readiness (TC), and comfort with non-face to face communication (CFT) used to measure e-learning readiness, meanwhile NASA TLX used to measure mental workload. Results showed differences between engineering and non-engineering students, especially in the Self-Directed Learning (p < 0,05). Non-engineering students perceived that they are more prepared to manage their learning process independently during online learning. Related to mental workload students perceive higher demands from online learning activities, the engineering group had higher level of time-related demands. According to correlation testing there was a negative and significant correlation between the self-directed learning dimension scores of E-Learning Readiness and the NASA TLX scores (p < 0,05). These results indicated the role of student’s e-learning readiness, especially self-directed learning readiness can reduce perceptions related to the mental workload experienced by engineering students in online learning. This condition was not applied on non-engineering students. Future study needed to explore the characteristics of study programs that relate to both variables and if the condition applied on other learning conditions such as hybrid learning.

References

[1] Suwarsono, L.W. 2015. Pengukuran e-learning readiness pada mahasiswa teknik Universitas Telkom. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 2(2), pp.141-152, //doi.org/10.15575/psy.v2i2.455
[2] Widyanti, A., Hasudungan, S. and Park, J., 2020. e-Learning readiness and perceived learning workload among students in an Indonesian university. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 12(1), pp.18-29.
[3] Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. 2003. Identifying learners who are ready for e-learning and supporting their success. Preparing learners for e-learning (pp. 18–33).
[4] Proffitt, L. N. 2008. A Study of the Influence of Learner Readiness on Academic Success and Student Perceptions of Online Learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Capella University. USA.
[5] Torun, E.D., 2020. Online distance learning in higher education: E-learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis, 12(2), pp.191-208.
[6] Kaymak, Z. D. & Horzum, M.B., 2013. Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), pp.1792-1797.
[7] Umyati, A., Susihono, W. & Mariawati, A.S. 2020. Measurement of psychological impact of industrial engineering students in fulfiil of online learning outcomes using NASA-TLX method. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 909, No. 1, p. 012064). IOP Publishing.
[8] Rubio-Valdehita, S., López-Higes, R. & Díaz-Ramiro, E., 2014. Academic context and perceived mental workload of psychology students. The Spanish journal of psychology, 17.
[9] Smith, A.P., 2019. Student workload, wellbeing, and academic attainment. In International symposium on human mental workload: Models and applications (pp. 35-47). Springer, Cham.
[10] Jung, E., & Lee, Y. 2020. College Students’ Entrepreneurial Mindset: Educational Experiences Override Gender and Major. Sustainability, 12(19), 8272.
[11] Nipa, T. J., & Kermanshachi, S. 2019. Assessment of open educational resources (OER) developed in interactive learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 1-27.
[12] Emerson, L., & MacKay, B. (2011). A comparison between paper‐based and online learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 727-735.
[13] Rubio-Valdehita, S., López-Núñez, I., & Díaz-Ramiro, E. M. 2017. Ergonomic assessment of mental workload in higher education. Effects of education system on student’s workload perception. Ergonomics International Journal, 1(1), 000106.
[14] Piskurich., G. M. 2003. Preparing Learners for E Learning. San Fransisco : John Wiley & Son Inc.
[15] Wollard, J. 2011. Psychology for the Classroom: E Learning. New York : Routledge.
[16] Borotis, S. & Poulymenakou, A. 2004. E-learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting e-learning interventions. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[17] R. Watkins, D. Leigh & D. Triner, 2004. Assessing readiness for elearning, Performance Improvement Quarterly, vol. 17 no. 4, pp. 66–79.
[18] Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. 2010. Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.
[19] Warner, D., Christie, G. & Choy, S. 1998. Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.
[20] Khatib, Z. N, Ajam A, & Badnava S. 2017. Determining the Relationship Between Self-directed Learning Readiness and Acceptance of E-learning and Academic Achievement of Students, Iran Journal of Nursing 30 (106) :11-22
[21] Mead, M. S. 2011. The effect of self-directed learning readiness and online course quality ratings on student satisfaction and academic performance in undergraduate eLearning. University of Missouri-Kansas City.
[22] Smith, P.J. 2005. Learning Preferences and Readiness for Online Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(1), pp. 3-12.
[23] Blankenship, Ray, & Atkinson, J. K. Undergraduate student online learning readiness. International Journal of Education Research, vol. 5, no. 2, summer 2010, pp. 44+.
[24] LaRose, Robert, Carolyn A. Lin, & Matthew S. E. 2003. Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?. Media Psychology 5.3 , 225-253.
[25] Bachman, Leonard, & Bachman, C. 2006. Student perceptions of academic workload in architectural education. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 271-304.
[26] Ellis, R. A., Ginns, P. & Piggott, L. 2009. E‐learning in higher education: some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study, Higher Education Research & Development, 28:3, 303-318, DOI: 10.1080/07294360902839909
[27] Kohan, N., Arabshahi, K. S., Mojtahedzadeh, R., Abbaszadeh, A., Rakhshani, T., & Emami, A. 2017. Self-directed learning barriers in a virtual environment: a qualitative study. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 5(3), 116.
[28] Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
[29] Aisha, A., Nugraha, F., & Suwarsono, L. 2019. Mental Workload Evaluation of Machining Tool Operators in Manufacturing SMEs. 2019 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019), 298-304
[30] Clarke, T., Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. 2005. The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational technology research and development 53(3), 15-24.
[31] Sulistiyani, E., & Budiarti, R. P. N. 2021. Analysis of Online Learning Readiness Level at Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (UNUSA). International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 5(01), 23-34.
[32] Phillips, J.A., Schumacher, C. & Arif, S., 2016. Time spent, workload, and student and faculty perceptions in a blended learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(6).
[33] Naji, K.K., Du, X., Tarlochan, F., Ebead, U., Hasan, M.A. Al-Ali, A.K.. 2020. Engineering Students' Readiness to Transition to Emergency Online Learning in Response to COVID-19: Case of Qatar. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10).
[34] Therisa Beena, K. K., & Sony, M. 2022. Student workload assessment for online learning: An empirical analysis during Covid-19. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 2010509.DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2021.2010509
[35] Wei, H. C. & Chou, C. 2020. Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter?, Distance Education, 41(1), 48-69, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
[36] Alotaibi, K. N. 2016. The learning environment as a mediating variable between self-directed learning readiness and academic performance of a sample of Saudi nursing and medical emergency students. Nurse education today, 36, 249-254.
[37] Harun, S., & Abd Aziz, N. 2021. Covid 19 Pandemic: Impact on Students’ Acceptance Towards Online Learning. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(5).
[38] Siddiqui, F. S., Nerali, J. T., & Telang, L. A. 2021. Relationship between the sense of coherence, self-directed learning readiness, and academic performance in Malaysian undergraduate dental students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10.